Yooil Bae
Singapore Management University, Singapore
Keywords: South Korea, decentralization, environmental governance, Ulsan
DOI: 10.5509/2013864759
This paper explores how decentralization has created a “local political arena” and has been transforming governance in the environmental management sector in South Korea. Korea has been known as a developmental state where the strong central government and businesses have conspicuously dominated during most of its industrialization period. Yet, the deepened democracy, global competitiveness and fiscal austerity have pressured central political stakeholders to devolve highly centralized functions and authority to local bodies since the mid-1990s. The building of democratic institutions at the local level, including directly elected mayors and city councils, has created room for local politics and diminished central political leverage over local affairs. The national economic crisis has highlighted the inefficiency of the centralized system and encouraged further administrative and fiscal decentralization under the democratic governments. In this context, while the central government and big businesses continue to have a significant say in policy making, local executives, with their expanded decisional authority and resources, are trying to improve the images of their cities and to take responsibility for promoting urban economies and improving quality of life in the age of trans-border links and competition. This paper analyzes the case of Ulsan, where Hyundai and several other conglomerates are located and which has been a symbol of state-led industrialization during most of the development period. Despite the large role played by the centre in the development of Ulsan, the empowered mayor of the city has successfully turned citizens’ attention to post-industrial aspects of governance for ensuring the future competitiveness of the city in global markets by orchestrating collaborative implementation of environmental policies. The paper explores how this governance shift in Ulsan has led successful collaborative environmental change by mobilizing local businesses, civic organizations and general citizens who might not have been interested in the making of an “environment-friendly city.”
本文探討韓國的權力下放如何創造了“當地政治舞台”並改變了環境管理部門的治理。韓國一直被認為是一個發展型國家,在其工業化時期,強大的中央政府與企業明顯地佔據了主導地位。然而,自二十世紀九十年代中期以來,民主進程的深化、對全球競爭力的追求以及財政緊縮迫使中央政治利益相關者將高度集中的職能和權力下放到了地方機構。在地方一級,直接選舉產生的市長和市議會等民主機構的建立為當地政治創造了空間並減弱了中央對地方事務的政治影響力。而全國性的經濟危機更凸顯了集中系統的低下效率,並鼓勵了在民主政府制度下進一步的行政和財政分權。在這種形勢下,盡管中央政府和大型企業在政策制定中仍然舉足輕重,依靠其增加的決策權與擴大的資源,當地的管理人員也在聯繫與競爭都已跨越來國界的時代試圖改善其城市形象並擔負起促進城市經濟和提高生活質量的責任。本文考察了現代和其它幾個韓國大企業集團的所在地蔚山的經驗。在韓國的發展時期,蔚山一直是國家所主導的工業化的象徵。儘管國家在蔚山的發展中發揮了巨大的作用,但市長被授予的權力使其成功地把公民的注意力轉移到後工業治理方面--即通過策劃協同實施的環保政策以確保該城市在全球市場的未來競爭力。本文探討了蔚山治理模式的轉變,及其如何通過動員本來可能對建設“環保城市”興趣不大的 當地企業、民間組織和普通公民協同合作而成功地改造了其環境。
韓國城市管理的權力下放與環保合作:現代城的經驗
Read Article on IngentaConnect requires institutional subscription