Tina Shrestha
Waseda University, Tokyo, Japan
Brenda S.A. Yeoh
National University of Singapore, Kent Ridge, Singapore
Keywords: infrastructure, migration, brokerage, Asia, low-wage labour
DOI: 10.5509/2018914663
This special issue develops brokerage as a historically specific category of practice to investigate its intricate link in shaping and sustaining Asian migration infrastructures. To understand this specific interconnection, the authors focus their analytical lenses on the emergence and functioning of migration infrastructures in the particular socio-cultural contexts of Nepal, Indonesia, the Philippines, and South Korea. Reflecting the “Asian infrastructural turn,” the collection examines diverse infrastructural forms, processes, and potentials embedded in, and in turn productive of, a range of brokerage activities, objects, institutions, and actors. Inspired by the ongoing methodological attention to the “migrant-broker” category, our ethnographic cases illuminate in various ways the specific social histories and political processes on which understandings of brokerage are based, and account for the different ways brokerage practices materialize across Asia. Of particular interest is the contingent social worlds of brokerage as they unfold in the everyday—through indeterminacy, unstable relational dynamics, institutional limits, and experimental possibilities—(re)organizing existing socio-cultural orders as well as convening infrastructural potentials.
导言
亚洲的中介实践与劳工流动基础设施的制造
关键词: 基础设施; 劳工流动; 中介; 亚洲;低薪劳工。
本期特刊将“中介”发展为一种具有历史特殊性的实践类别,以考察其在塑造和维持亚洲外籍劳工流动基础设施方面的内在联系。为理解这种特定的相互关联性,特刊的作者们将分析的透镜聚焦于劳工流动基础设施在尼泊尔、印度尼西亚、菲律宾和韩国的特定社会-文化语境当中的兴起和运作。 特刊文集反映了“亚洲的基础设施转向“, 考查了嵌入在——并相应地生产制造——一系列中介活动、目标、制度和行动者中的多样化的基础设施形式、过程以及潜能。 受到目前不断发展的对“流动者-中介”这一范畴的方法论关注的启示, 本特刊中民族志研究的案例通过各种方式展示出对中介的理解所基于的特定的社会史和政治过程, 并且解释了中介实践在整个亚洲得以实现的各种不同方式。 其中特别有意味的是中介的偶发性的社会世界,当它们——通过不确定性、不稳定的关系性动态、制度性局限以及试验性的可能性——在日常生活中展开, (重新)组织现有的社会文化秩序并聚集基础设施的潜能。
Translated from English by Li Guo
Read Article on IngentaConnect requires institutional subscription