Patrick Messerlin
Sciences Po Paris, Paris, France
Jimmyn Parc
Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea
Keywords: film industry; film policy; subsidy; France; Korea; competitiveness
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5509/201790151
Many countries are becoming interested in developing their film industries as a way of promoting their national culture and increasing their soft power. With the continued global dominance of Hollywood films, policy makers are increasingly considering government subsidies as an essential tool in promoting their national film industries. However, the actual effectiveness of subsidies in promoting a film industry remains debatable. In order to better address this issue, this paper evaluates and compares the experiences of France and Korea. Both countries have adopted exactly the same sequence of instruments—import quotas, screen quotas, and then subsidies—yet have applied almost the opposite subsidy policies. Since the 1950s, France has intensively used subsidies while Korea has not. After more than a half century, these different subsidy policies have led to very different outcomes. This paper shows that a film industry without significant government subsidies can prosper better in the long term than a heavily subsidized one. This is an important lesson for countries that want to develop their film industry and to promote their culture by designing effective film policies.
70年代至今)电影产业补贴的真正影响:法国和韩国的教训
关键词:电影产业, 电影政策,补贴,法国,韩国,竞争力。
很多国家现在对通过发展电影产业来推进文化及其软实力很感兴趣。随着好莱坞电影继续主导世界,政策制定者日益将政府补贴视为推进各国电影产业的一个根本性的工具。然而,对电影产业的补贴真正有多有效,这还是有一个很有争议的问题。为了更好地解答这个疑问,本文比较和评估了法国和韩国的经验。两国都根据同样的时序采取了以下的政策工具:进口配额、银幕时间配额,然后是补贴——但他们几乎采取了相反的补贴政策。自50年代以来,法国施行了高强度的补贴,而韩国并未如此。半个多世纪过去了,这些不同的补贴政策产生了非常不同的后果。本文表明,跟接受政府深度补贴的电影产业相比,没有受到显著补贴的电影产业反而可以在长时期内更为繁荣。对于那些想要通过设计实施有效的电影产业政策来发展电影产业和推广该国文化的国家来说,这是一个非常重要的研究发现。
Translated from English by Li Guo
Read Article on IngentaConnect requires institutional subscription