Rithiya Serey
American University of Phnom Penh, Phnom Penh, Cambodia
Robert Tanner Bivens
Eastern Illinois University
Aarie Glas
Northern Illinois University
Keywords: ASEAN, Myanmar, non-interference, centrality, social theory, practice
DOI: 10.5509/2024974-art5
In this article, we examine the contours of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations’ (ASEAN) response to the latest regional challenge from Myanmar, the 2021 coup. Scholars and practitioners alike often portray ASEAN as a relatively cohesive community of states united in adherence to a long-held and comparatively stable set of norms within the so-called “ASEAN way.” Core among these norms has been domestic non-interference. However, we argue that rather than being determined by a coherent set of agreed norms, ASEAN’s response to this crisis has been shaped by intra-regional contestation and division around how ASEAN ought to enact its particular “way” of regional governance. More narrowly, we show that the ASEAN response has been shaped by contestation over competing normative impulses in the organization—centrality and non-interference—which have developed in increasing tension since the humanitarian disaster after Cyclone Nargis in 2008 and the Rohingya crisis after 2016. We show that in response to these crises, officials from the organization and its member states advanced divergent accounts of what ASEAN ought to do and why, given competing normative commitments to centrality and non-interference. By showing how ASEAN’s response to the 2021 coup is the result of internal contestation within the organization, we support accounts of regional governance in Southeast Asia and stress less the fixity of ASEAN norms than their contestation in practice. To make our argument we analyze more than 250 documents and draw on interviews with regional officials.
“这不是 90 年代” :缅甸和东盟规范性秩序的变化
关键词: 东盟、缅甸、互不干涉、中心主义、社会理论、实践
在本文中,我们考察了自 2021 年政变以来东盟对来自缅甸的最新区域性挑战的应对的概貌。学者和行业内人士都经常将东南亚国家联盟 (ASEAN) 描绘成一个有凝聚力的国家共同体,这些国家通过遵守所谓的“东盟方式”中长期存在的相对稳定的一套规范而团结在一起。这些规范的核心是互不干涉内政。但我们认为,东盟对这场危机的反应不是由一套协商好的贯通一致的规范决定的,而是由区域内围绕东盟应该如何实施其特定的区域治理的“方式”发生的争议和分歧所塑造的。更狭义地说,我们表明,东盟的应对受到该组织内部围绕相互竞争的规范性动机——中心主义和互不干涉——进行的争论的影响,自 2008 年纳尔吉斯飓风造成的人道主义灾难和 2016 年罗兴亚危机以来,这种争论日益激化。我们表明,在应对这些危机时,鉴于对中心主义和互不干涉规范的相互竞争的承诺,该组织及其成员国的官员对东盟应该做什么以及为什么这样做提出了不同的说法。通过展示东盟对 2021 年政变的反应是该组织内部争论的结果,我们提出了东南亚区域治理的观点,强调的不是东盟规范的固定性,而是它们在实践中引起的争论。为提出此论点,我们分析了 250 多份文件,并借鉴了对该地区官员的访谈。