Ik Tien Ngu
Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Keywords: secession, autonomy, decentralization, cultural pluralism, federation, ethnoreligious nationalism
DOI: 10.5509/2023962323
Compared to Sarawak state elections, in the 2022 general election (GE15) the incumbent Sarawak Parties Alliance (Gabungan Parti Sarawak, GPS) and Sarawak-based opposition parties’ campaigns demonstrated a tendency toward a moderate rather than radical autonomy discourse. In GE15, these candidates attempted to reconcile their regionalism with nationalism to stay relevant in the national political landscape. Meanwhile, opposition parties performed better in certain Chinese- and Dayak-majority seats, exposing the limits of the Sarawak autonomy discourse. To explain these patterns, this article locates Sarawak against the backdrop of a centralized Malaysian federal government to clarify the salience of both structural and cultural factors in shaping autonomy claims. It shows the importance of inclusive and democratic institutions, like a general election, in integrating peripheral communities and checking radical regionalism. Further, preceding the general election, the readiness of the federal government to delegate power to the state government effectively secured the state ruling elite’s commitment to remain in the national government. However, institutional decentralization is insufficient to calm autonomy claims, as cultural pluralism increasingly underpins Sarawak regionalism. Sarawak’s autonomy discourse will not fade away and could radicalize again if the central government holds to exclusive ethnoreligious nationalism.
马来西亚第15届大选中沙捞越区域主义的缓和
关键词:分离,自治,权力下放,文化多元主义,联邦,以族裔-宗教为基础的民族主义。
与沙捞越州选举相比,2022年大选 (GE15)中现任的沙捞越政党联盟 (Gabungan Parti Sarawak, GPS)与以沙捞越为基地的反对党的竞选活动都展示出温和而非激进的自治话语的倾向。在第15届大选中,这些候选人试图将其区域主义与民族主义相调和,以期保持与全国政治大环境的相关性。与此同时,反对党在某些华人或者达雅人多数派议席的竞争中表现更佳,暴露出沙捞越自治话语的局限性。为解释这些模式,本文将沙捞越置于权力集中化的马来西亚联邦政府的背景之下,以厘清结构性和文化性因素在形成自治诉求中的突出地位。它表明了诸如大选这种包容性和民主的制度在整合外围社区和制约激进地方主义方面的重要性。进一步而言,在大选之前,联邦政府已经为将权力下放给州政府做好准备,这有效地保证了州统治精英对留在中央政府内的承诺。然而,随着文化多元主义日益成为沙捞越的区域主义的支撑,制度上的分权不足以平息自治的诉求。如果中央政府坚持排他性的以族裔-宗教为基础的民族主义立场,沙捞越的自治话语不会消退,并且可能会再度激进化。
Translated by Li Guo
Read Article on IngentaConnect requires institutional subscription