Kanti Bajpai
National University of Singapore, Singapore
Keywords: Doklam, conflict, border, coalition, normalization, change, Modi
DOI: 10.5509/2018912245
The Doklam confrontation between India and China in the summer of 2017 was symbolic of the brewing tensions in their relationship. While the confrontation was resolved peacefully, its roots go back at least to 2007. Both the Manmohan Singh government and the Narendra Modi government pushed back against what they perceived to be a series of moves on bilateral, regional, and international issues that went against Indian interests. Modi’s responses have been more aggressive than Manmohan Singh’s in two ways. First, under Modi, India has more openly than ever before attempted to construct a coalition of militarily powerful states in the Asia-Pacific to increase Delhi’s bargaining power with Beijing. Second, India has sought to change the terms of engagement on the border conflict in three respects: a return to clarification of the Line of Actual Control (LAC) as the first step in border negotiations; linking further normalization between the two countries to progress towards a final border settlement; and seeking to inject a greater sense of urgency in the search for a settlement. This article concludes by asking why Modi responded more aggressively to China. It presents four explanations and concludes that Modi’s election in May 2014 coincided with a growing sense of strategic exasperation in India over its China policy, which questioned the value of the post-1988 commitment to normalization. The paper suggests that Modi shared that sense of exasperation, hence the rapid change in India’s stance within months of his coming to power.
莫迪的对中国政策和通往冲突之路
关键词: 洞朗,冲突,边界,同盟,正常化,变更,莫迪
2017年夏季印度与中国在洞朗(Doklam)发生的冲突象征着两国间酝酿的紧张关系。尽管冲突得以和平解决,但其根源最起码可以追溯至2007年。对于一系列他们视为侵犯印度利益的双边、地区以及国际问题上的举动,曼莫汉·辛格(Manmohan Singh)和纳伦德拉·莫迪( Narendra Modi)两任政府都做出反击。莫迪的回应与辛格相比更为来势凶猛,这体现在两个方面: 首先在莫迪任上,印度比从前更为公开地试图建构一个亚太地区军事强国联盟,以增强德里对北京讨价还价的实力;其次,印度寻求改变边境冲突问题上印中互动中三个方面的条件:回到对实控线(the Line of Actual Control)的澄清,作为边境谈判的第一步;将两国关系的进一步正常化与最终解决边境问题联系在一起;并赋予寻求最终解决更强的紧迫感。本文在结论中提出为何莫迪对华回应更为来势汹汹的问题,并给出了四种解释。结论认为2014年5月莫迪的选举适逢印度越来越强烈的对印度对华政策的战略恼怒情绪,其对1988年后两国关系正常化的承诺的价值提出了质疑。本文提出,莫迪本人也具有那种恼怒情绪,因此在执政数月间就迅速改变了印度的立场。
Translated from English by Li Guo
Read Article on IngentaConnect requires institutional subscription