
Shiro Armstrong
Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
Liam Gammon
Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
Keywords: Australian politics, preferential voting, migration politics, globalization politics, educational polarization, conservative populism
DOI: 10.5509/2025984-art4
The landslide victory won by the incumbent centre-left Labor Party in Australia’s May 2025 federal election capped a remarkable turnaround for a government that just months earlier appeared vulnerable to defeat at the hands of a conservative opposition that had flirted with populist appeals. We argue that Labor’s re-election was down to both good timing and favourable long-term political dynamics. Drawing on electoral data, campaign discourse, and existing scholarship, we argue that the conduct and outcome of the election confirmed the continuing symbiosis between Australia’s pro-globalization elite consensus and public preferences on key issues like free trade and migration. Australia’s electoral system, economic geography, and path dependencies created by past liberalizing reforms have limited the capacity for anti-globalization or nativist parties to acquire an agenda-setting position in mainstream politics. The Liberal-National opposition coalition’s perceived ideological alignment with Trumpism alienated key demographics, while Labor’s cautious centrism dovetailed with voters’ preference for stability as the global impacts of Trump 2.0 loomed large. Yet, we caution that chronic challenges of unaffordable housing and stagnant productivity could erode the social and economic foundations of Australia’s open, liberal consensus if not addressed by the Labor government’s forward reform agenda.
“特姆版特朗普主义”为何在澳大利亚失败:工党的压倒性胜利与支持全球化的共识
关键词: 澳大利亚政治,偏好投票制,移民政治,全球化政治,教育两极分化,保守民粹主义
在2025年5月澳大利亚联邦选举中,执政的中左翼工党以压倒性优势获胜,标志着就在几个月前还似乎很容易被有浅尝民粹主义的保守派反对党击败的政府实现了一次显著的转变。我们认为,工党的连任既得益于良好的时机,也得益于有利的长期政治动态。基于选举数据、竞选言论和现有学术研究,我们认为,此次选举的进行和结果证实了澳大利亚支持全球化的精英共识与公众在自由贸易和移民等关键问题上的偏好之间持续的共生关系。澳大利亚的选举制度、经济地理以及过往自由化改革所造成的路径依赖,限制了反全球化或本土主义政党在主流政治中获得议程设定地位的能力。自由党-国家党反对派联盟在意识形态上与特朗普主义的明显对齐,疏远了关键的人口群体;而工党谨慎的中间立场则与选民在特朗普2.0版全球影响日益凸显之际对稳定的偏好相契合。然而,我们警告称,如果工党政府改革的未来议程不解决房价过高和生产力停滞等长期挑战,澳大利亚开放、自由主义共识的社会和经济基础可能会受到侵蚀。