Alexander Mawyer
University of Hawai’i at Mānoa, Honolulu, USA
Keywords: Floating islands, seasteads, frontiers, boundary objects, oceanic futurities
DOI: 10.5509/2021941123
Technological advances have challenged numerous social and political domains over recent decades, including the materialities and imaginaries of islands and islandness in Oceania. Since the early 2000s, a plurality of schemes, discourses, politics, anxieties, and hopes have coalesced around the possible construction of artificial islands, referred to as floating islands, floating nations, floating cities, or seasteads, depending on the new islands’ imagined purposes and peoples. If achieved, these new, de novo, islands will contribute to an ongoing regional geopolitical remaking that requires urgent attention. However, in examining floating islands as boundary objects, this article suggests that, even if never realized, they are exceptional points of focus for perceiving and reflecting on the uncanny, disruptive character of capital at work in the contemporary Pacific Islands in tension with multi-state regional policy initiatives for collective governance and sustainable ocean management. Moreover, this article argues that floating islands are not the only “artificial islands” producing tensions between communities, states, and international ocean governance frameworks. Deep-sea concessions for mineral exploitation, the spatialization of high-seas fishing rights, and large- and small-scale conservation zones similarly raise issues of the fixity or fluidity of territoriality, sovereignty, rights of access and restriction to common or uncommon marine spaces and their resources, as well as conflicting imaginaries and ideologies around the ocean and Oceania as an open frontier.
浮岛、边疆以及大洋洲未来边缘的其它边界对象
关键词:浮岛;海上建筑;边疆;边界对象;海洋未来。
近几十年来,技术进步已经挑战了诸多社会和政治领域。新兴科技同样也挑战了大洋洲的岛屿和岛屿性的实体性以及虚构性。自二十一世纪初起,多种计划、话语体系、政治、焦虑以及希望都汇集在可能建造的人工岛上,根据想象中这些新岛屿的目的及人群的不同,这些岛屿分别称之为浮岛、漂浮民族、漂浮城市或是海上建筑。如果建成,这些崭新的岛屿将会影响到正在进行中的迫切需要加以关注的区域性的地缘政治重建。然而,通过将浮岛作为边界对象加以考察,本文提出,即使永远无法建成,它们也应该是不同凡响的关注焦点,用以观照并反思资本在当代太平洋岛国运作时与多国区域性集体治理和可持续海洋管理的政策举措之间的紧张关系,以及神秘莫测和扰乱性的特征。本论文借助于海滩比喻,提出浮岛并不是唯一在社区、国家和国际海洋治理框架之间制造矛盾的“人工岛”。 矿物开采的深海特许经营权、公海捕鱼权的空间化以及大、小规模的保育区也类似地提出了以下方面的问题:领域性的固定化或流动性、主权、共同或者非共同海洋空间及其资源的使用权及限制,以及围绕着作为开放的边疆的海洋和大洋洲的各种冲突性的想象和意识形态。
Translated from English by Li Guo
Read Article on IngentaConnect requires institutional subscription